/consulting/qdeployment // from audit to production
Three implementation variants. Measurable performance guarantee with KPIs auditable 90 days post-Go-Live: process time reduction ≥63%, TDC ≥84%. Hypercare 2–4 weeks. From scattered data to a data-driven organization.
/consulting/qdeployment/archetype // who this is for
QDeployment starts from AiP Audit recommendations. Client profile — organization size, source system stack, regulatory regime — determines the variant.
Production lines with a heterogeneous controller stack, MES without ERP integration, anomalies detected by operators — not by the system. Implementation covers an anomaly detection layer on shop-floor data and automatic escalation to maintenance.
Law firms, design offices, audit firms, consultancies. Workflows based on cases and contracts — senior partner time burned on operations that a system should handle. Implementation covers a case triage layer and automatic document distribution.
Chain operations — from individual delis to networks with hundreds of locations. Replenishment done manually, demand forecasting in spreadsheets, losses on SKU rotation. Implementation covers a forecasting and replenishment layer integrated with POS registers and warehousing.
/consulting/qdeployment/variants // pricing and scope
The QDeployment methodology is singular — gate-driven, with performance guarantees and measurable KPIs. The variant determines only the breadth of scope, schedule length, and depth of the redundancy layer. Same foundation: from scattered data to a data-driven organization.
150,000–1,500,000 PLN
4–8 months
250,000–50,000,000 PLN
8–16 months
from 50,000,000 PLN
undefined
/consulting/qdeployment/workflow // four phases, three gates
Deadlines don't determine transitions — criteria do. A gate you haven't passed blocks the invoice for the next phase and returns work to the previous one.
/consulting/qdeployment/sla // guaranteed metrics
Every variant shares the same SLA foundation. They differ in response time, optional auditor cross-check, and standards depth (from ADR + runbook in Core to custom governance in Enterprise).
| Criterion | Core | Performance | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Production system (not a pilot) | yes | yes | yes |
| Process time reduction ≥63% | yes | yes | yes |
| TDC (Throughput-to-Defect Coefficient) ≥84% | yes | yes | yes |
| ADR documentation + runbook | yes | yes | + custom governance |
| P1 response time | 4 h | 2 h | 1 h |
KPIs measured over 90 days post-Go-Live, on client production data — under working conditions, not synthetic. Full architecture and decision documentation on client side, regardless of variant.
/consulting/qdeployment/transfer // what stays after us
After hypercare, your team knows how to maintain, debug, and extend the system without us. ADR documentation and runbooks stay with you — not on our repo.
/consulting/qdeployment/hypercare // 2–4 weeks post-Go-Live
Response time measured in hours, not days. Dedicated Slack channel, weekly standup, rollback playbook for every production stage.
Incident classification on first contact. P1 = production down. P2 = KPI degradation. P3 = cosmetic, no operational impact.
Direct access to the QA10 team without tickets. Weekly standup with three roles — client product owner, QA10 lead engineer, optionally risk officer.
Every production stage has a documented safe-state checkpoint. Rollback to last stable state — playbook executable by an operator without engineering support.
/consulting/qdeployment/compliance // regulatory stacks
Implementations in regulated sectors require more than checklists. Every architectural decision maps to a regulation article — external auditors receive ready-made compliance documentation.
Chemicals
Substances, mixtures, hazard classification. SDS card mapping to REACH registry, CLP audit in the labeling layer, IUCLID integration.
Cybersecurity
Essential service operator. Incident policy, CSIRT reporting within 24 h, supplier risk management, baseline audit every 24 months.
Metrology
Central Office of Measures — measuring instruments, legal verification, standards. Annual verification cycle workflow, alerts at 90/30/7 days, office-side audit.
E-invoicing
National e-Invoice System. Integration with MF gateway, FA(2) schema, invoice stream audit, 10-year retention compliant with tax ordinance.
/consulting/qdeployment/discount // from audit to deployment
−9%
For Platinum AiP Audit variant clients. Active for 12 months from report sign-off — this is the 12-month exclusivity period for implementation only with QA10. Discount calculated on contract price, no minimum thresholds.
Cross-stage logic — the audit pays for answers, the implementation pays for results. The 9% discount reflects value the Platinum client has already delivered in the discovery phase (organizational context, stack access, AS-IS process maps) plus the exclusivity commitment. Full variant structure at /consulting/aip/#variants.
/consulting/qdeployment/faq // frequently asked questions
Three differences. First, production system, not a pilot — the implementation finishes in target conditions, not demo-ready. Second, foundations — we start from scattered data, we end with a data-driven organization with measurable KPIs (process time reduction ≥63%, TDC ≥84% measured over 90 days post-Go-Live). Third, ADR documentation (Architecture Decision Records) — every architectural decision has documented reasoning, rejected alternatives, and cost of change. A typical IT implementation leaves you with a system; QDeployment leaves you with a system, a foundation, and the knowledge of why it looks the way it does.
8–16 months depending on the number of processes (3–8), integrated systems (5–15), and regulatory requirements. The implementation is gate-driven, not deadline-driven — each of three gates (Architecture → Build, Build → UAT, UAT → Hypercare) must pass acceptance criteria. Forcing a deadline at the expense of quality is a path to technical debt, so we don’t do it.
2–4 weeks of hypercare included in the price — P1 response time under 1 h, dedicated Slack channel, weekly standup with the client team, rollback playbook for every production stage. After hypercare, three paths — QCare subscription (separate product — monitoring, minor changes, quarterly review), transition to in-house mode with our ADR documentation and runbooks, or scope expansion in a new QDeployment contract.
Yes — the Core variant is designed for exactly that. Up to 3 processes, up to 5 integrated systems, 4–8 months. We usually start with the most critical process from the AiP Audit recommendations — the one with the highest ROI and lowest integration risk. Additional processes are added in the Performance variant after the first Go-Live, once the client team has seen how our workflow operates in production.
/consulting/qdeployment/ // next step
Discovery session 30 min. Preliminary scope + contract outline + variant estimate within 48 h of the session.